Thursday, April 8, 2010

One year later

In a couple weeks it will be a year since I started this blog. Anniversaries are always times for reflection and after all that's happened, it's hard to recall the sense of anticipation leading up to June 1, 2009 and to the point where I finally got my original birth certificate in September.

I've been silent here since then, so some updates are in order. A lot happened very quickly once my information arrived. Armed with my birth mother's maiden surname, I found the first clue about her family with the first Google search I attempted. Within a few days I knew the basic outlines of the story.

I wrote that I had felt "three decades of joy and heartbreak" in one evening, and if anything I feel both emotions even more strongly, now that know more. The first thundering revelation which that September evening brought was that my birth mother had died several years ago, of natural causes. After all these years of searching for myself and others, of second-guessing and double-checking every fact and conclusion and feeling the exultation when a fact was verified, I will never forget feeling as trapped by truth as I did that night. Every detail fit, every single one. There was no escaping it: she was gone and we would never meet.

The second discovery, which took some work to verify, was that my birth parents had married a few years after my birth and had other children. No father was named on my original birth certificate (I've since learned this is near-universal for Ontario adoptees because of legal restrictions on unmarried fathers putting down their names) but the details of the husband named in her obituary matched the profile I had. I had half-expected this since they both told the social workers they would likely marry eventually, but it was a shock to find it really did happen and that I had full siblings.

In a few weeks I had my father's mailing address and then I fell into a deep well of paralyzing self-doubt and uncertainty. Googling names was one thing: if you fail, try different keywords! This was a living man and I would only get one shot at an intro: what the hell do I say? The words of The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock came to mind:

Do I dare
Disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse

For I have known them all already, known them all:—
Have known the evenings, mornings, afternoons,
I have measured out my life with coffee spoons;
I know the voices dying with a dying fall
Beneath the music from a farther room.
So how should I presume?

"Decisions and revisions": plans formulated then abandoned, letters half-composed then deleted and forgotten. As I sniffed the faint online traces of the lives of my "new" relatives, I felt indeed like I was hearing muffled voices "from a farther room", and as the weeks wore on and I maintained my silence I felt increasingly like a creep, a stalker even, and had to forcibly remind myself that I had justifiable reasons for both my interest and my delay.

Finally, at work in the middle of one autumn afternoon I decided to force the issue. I had a letter in the mailbox for that afternoon's mail pickup. It was polite, friendly, a bit cool. I started by giving my adoptive name and birthday and said I was adopted. I then gave my birth name and my natural mother's name, said that I knew she had died and that she had been his wife, and finally said that I believed he was my natural father; I didn't make reference to any other recent information I had about them including the existence of children. I gave a short bio and wrote that I was interested in corresponding and eventually meeting, and gave him my mailing address, email, and phone number. Of course, for the next few weeks I obsessively checked all of them. (If I had it to do again, I would've left off the cell number as the thought that he might try calling me anytime there was the cause for a lot of unnecessary panic.)

Three weeks later, I got a reply letter. I had steeled myself so completely for any sort of negativity or rejection that I'm told I was completely emotionless while reading it. If so I was bracing for a blow that never came, as the letter was all I could ever have hoped for: friendly, inviting, warm. He proposed a meeting soon, and one week and two brief phone conversations later, we all met (him, his children, and I). We talked for many hours and shared photos. There are people who take after only one parent or neither, but I am not one: I'm very much a blend of both. Mostly of my mother, but in the right light and with the right expression I am a spitting image of him.

The first meeting was a few months ago and the road since has been a long one, with many new faces along the way. The number of in-person meetings is still quite small but we've been in touch over email, phone, and Facebook. It's early days still but I can already feel things transitioning from the short to the medium-term, where the issue is finding a comfortable position for the future. How can you be someone's brother when you've only just met? Do I treat them as something like cousins, i.e. relatives who you get together with at holidays and for the odd dinner, or as something more?

There are many things I regret about the course of events and while I have no wish to be burdened by them or allow them to obstruct the reunion, I think of them all the same. The regret I own is not having done all this earlier. I first contacted the provincial disclosure registry in 1996, but on learning of their colossal wait times I abandoned any hope they would help me and didn't sign up until seven years later, after she was gone. I also could have looked earlier and harder. To my fellow searchers I say, don't rush but please don't think you have all the time in the world either.

A year ago, empty of knowledge and full of anticipation, I could never have believed I would have come so far in such a short time. If I was afraid of something then, it was of learning nothing at all, i.e. getting a disclosure veto. (Now I know I was guaranteed never to get a veto for the grim reason that only my mother was entitled to file one.) I would not have been surprised at how much this has obsessed me and frankly I don't regret that obsession; thinking hard about things has led to being careful and attentive, and that was a help when events picked up their pace.

A year ago, I was prepared to be shocked and amazed, joyful and heartbroken, fearful and exuberant, and I was all of those things. Above all the welcome and all the pain, though, is the gift of Truth, of knowledge I never had before. That apple was always mine even if once it was too high for me to reach, and no matter the outcome I will never regret taking it.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

The end

The letter came yesterday. So many questions answered and so many more to ask.

All my guesses were wrong, but given what I know now I don't see how I could've known how and where to look. Maybe a private investigator would have known, and that's something that will bother me.

Nothing, nothing for 31 years and now this, all at once. Three decades of joy and heartbreak in one family, all read vicariously, all at once. Every 10 minutes, another Google query and another thundering revelation. It's an overwhelming, mind-blowing trip, but wherever it takes me, this is one trip I've always wanted to go on.

If only I could have left sooner. My consolation is that it wasn't my choice.

More later.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Stats on Post-Adoption Birth Information forms

Fifteen weeks and still waiting. I was recently forwarded some new stats on Post-Adoption Birth Information requests from the Ontario Ministry of Government Services. From conversations with Service Ontario I understand that they are still, as of this moment, processing the 2007 forms so it's obviously of interest to anyone who's not gotten their information yet just how many such forms there are.

Any numbers below should be taken as corrections to anything I published earlier.









Post-Adoption Birth Information forms received by the Ontario government, Sept 2007 to present

September 2007Jun 1–19, 2009Jun 20-Jul 31Total
All372307126936136
Filed by birth parent9511661261
Filed by adoptee27746034875
(The ? symbols indicate a lack of information on my part.)

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Thirteen weeks later

I'll admit I had been prepared for some delays and thought the 6-8 week timeline unduly optimistic but I really believed that now, thirteen weeks after June 1, I would have got something in the mail.

Anecdotal accounts tell of some 2007 applicants having gotten their info, but these are few and hard to come by. Secondhand information suggests that the Ontario government has processed the first batch of the 2007 Post-Adoption Birth Information requests, with a large pile of 2007 requests and all 2009 requests still pending.

The government's handling of this wait period is absolutely inexcusable. All the applications yet processed are from 2007; all the relevant vetoes and other forms arrived, at latest, just after June 1. By mid-July, it must have been evident how long it would take to process these documents.

Instead of presenting us with a realistic time estimate, they tossed out 12 weeks as a bone to the baying masses. I spoke to a very polite ServiceOntario rep on the phone, so I'm quite sure of what they promised: 12 weeks from receipt of the request (or from June 1 for requests from 2007). It's now obvious that, just as they couldn't deliver in 6-8 weeks from June 1, they can't deliver now.

While I appreciate that adoption disclosure is not the Ontario government's highest priority, they have a duty not to offer us misleading time estimates. It's clear that on this file, they're bad schedulers, slow workers, or awful communicators. They have to step up their game: this is a one-time event, can't it justify a little more attention?

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

The final stretch

Word came on one of the mailing lists I'm on that some people have received their Post-Adoption Birth Information. The government's revised target of 12 weeks will expire this Friday, so it's no surprise that my obsession about this has heightened to near-epic levels.

I have the sort of job where I could, if I really had to, just toss off an email to my boss and say "I'm working from home today." It's not without consequences, but I could get away with it if I had to. And so every morning this week, I've thought to myself "should I stay home today to wait for the mail?"

I haven't done so yet, and what purpose would it serve really? But it's hard to fight the temptation. I concoct elaborate plans for just how and when I'll open the envelope (take a day off work, go for a long contemplative walk, and open the letter over a Scotch?) and what it will reveal. I agonize over the thought of getting a veto, or even of having only information about my birth mother and not my birth father.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Updated disclosure and contact veto stats

In July I posted a summary of numbers from the Ontario government about forms relating to adoption disclosure. Today's copy of the Cornwall Standard-Freeholder has an interesting reunion story which includes some new stats from the government which are good till July 24, so I've included them in an updated summary and corrected some minor errors from before:


Forms relating to adoption disclosure received by MCSS, Sept 2008 to present
Sept–Dec 2008Jan–Apr 2009May 2009Jun 1–19, 2009Jun 20-Jul 24Total
Disclosure VetoAll9211,4902,2431,367~400~6,400
Filed by birth parent543490????
Filed by adoptee3581,000????
No Contact Notice (contact veto)All1,050265152~50~1,500
Filed by birth parent650????
Filed by adoptee400????
Notice of Contact PreferenceAll1,5001512191822052
Filed by birth parent625????
Filed by adoptee875????
Post-Adoption Birth Information03,4432,7916,234

(The ? symbols indicate a lack of information on my part.)

(Note that the Standard-Freeholder story credits the reunion to the new law; I doubt very much that this is possible. The government is certainly not at the stage even now, where a one-week turnaround time is possible, and they were hugely backlogged in June. Plus, if this were through the new law, it would be the adoptee doing the calling, not the Custodian of Adoption Information. Much more likely is the explanation that this was done through the old search service offered by the Adoption Disclosure Register and the timeframe near June 1 was just a coincidence or an effort to clear old backlogs before everything changes!).

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Four more weeks

Sigh. The word on the mailing lists, from some people who've called up ServiceOntario to ask for a new ETA, is that because of all the requests they've received (Post-Adoption Birth Information, vetoes, and contact preference forms) that the expected 6-8 weeks has expanded to 12 weeks. What does this mean? Four more weeks.

Sure, this sucks, but at least it's better to know. I won't be rushing to the mailbox every day after work for whole bloody month!

I also heard that the workers have clarified that pending Post-Adoption Birth Information (PABI) requests from 2007 will be processed before anything else that came after June 1, which I'm happy about. I'd been wondering just what would happen if a disclosure veto arrived after June 1, but before the response to the PABI request was mailed out. The answer is "nothing", i.e. the PABI request has priority.